Description: In September 2000, the Division of Child Development issued star rated licenses to all eligible child care centers. Facilities can receive one to five stars.
Accordingly, State Line Children's World began implementing new structure standards and curriculums. Encouraged staff to go back to college and obtain a higher level of education in early childhood. Because of our rigorous preparation in 2006 State Line Children's World chose to voluntarily apply for the advanced licensure through DCD.
In December 2006, State Line Children's World obtained five stars, which is the highest rated license issued by DCD.
This process included a consultative visit from the Division of Child Development who evaluates State Line Children's World with three quality components: Staff Education, Program Standards and Compliance History. Our license and high reflecting our award-winning service are displayed in each of our classrooms. The star rated license acts as a roadmap for our center to follow as we seek to provide continued quality enrichment and individual care for each of our students.
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns, as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Date | Type | Violations | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-05 | Unannounced Inspection | No | |
| 2025-10-09 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2025-10-09 | Violation | 858 | .0604(q) |
| Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age. In space #1, a plastic bag was used to store art supplies. This was corrected by removing the plastic bag. | |||
| 2025-10-09 | Violation | 1034 | .0701(a) |
| All staff, including the director, did not have an annual health questionnaire on file following the initial medical statement. The director's questionnaire was dated 8/26/24. | |||
| 2025-10-09 | Violation | 1043 | G.S. 110-91( 9) |
| All staff records, except financial records, were not made available for review. Two staff files were unavailable for review. | |||
| 2025-10-09 | Violation | 1805 | G.S. 110-90.2 & .2703(r) |
| A child care operator did not notify the Division of any new child care providers, as defined in G.S. 110-90.2(a)(2), who were hired or moved into the child care facility within five business days. None of the staff members had been added to the system. | |||
| 2025-02-25 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2025-02-25 | Violation | 858 | .0604(q) |
| Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age. In space #1, plastic bags were located in each child's cubby. The cubbies were low and accessible to the children. The youngest child in attendance was 2 years old. This was correcting by removing the bags. | |||
| 2024-12-04 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2024-12-04 | Violation | 1124 | 10A NCAC 09 .1003(d) |
| Emergency and identifying information, including the child's name, photograph, emergency contact information and/or a copy of the emergency medical care information form was not in the vehicle for each child being transported. The photograph for three children transported was not on the van used to transport children. | |||
| 2024-12-04 | Violation | 1128 | 10A NCAC 09 .1003(l) |
| For routine transport of children to and from the center, staff did not use the list to document attendance as children boarded and departed the vehicle. Documentation was not on file for children transported this morning. | |||
| 2024-12-04 | Violation | 1232 | 10A NCAC 09 .0514(f) |
| Each employee's personnel file did not contain an annual staff evaluation and a staff development plan. One staff member did not review their development plan at least annually. | |||
| 2024-12-04 | Violation | 1321 | GS110-91(1) |
| Medical exam or health assessment record was not on file before or within 30 days after admission. Documentation was not on file for one child. | |||
| 2024-01-25 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2024-01-25 | Violation | 524 | .0510(d)(2)(A-C) |
| When children 3 years and older were in care, screen time was not used to stimulate a developmental domain; was not limited to 30 minutes a day and no more than a total of two and a half hours per week, per child; and/or was not documented on a cumulative log or the activity plan that is available for review. In space #1, screen time was offered to 14 children. A log was not filled out for the viewing. | |||
If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Write a review about STATELINE CHILDREN'S WORLD #1. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
Connect, Seek Advice, Share Knowledge
We thought everything was wonderful here for nearly a year, until the owner's husband revealed himself. He charged across the parking lot at me like a raging bull shouting aggressively about how I parked in their empty parking lot. (in a pull-through position so there would be no need to back up where small children might be present) He got right in my face to tell me he thought I had a problem! No attempt to calm him into a reasonable tone had any effect and only seemed to spur him to shout even louder over me. Needless to say I was shocked! I had never even spoken to this man before who I thought was a hired groundskeeper. Not wanting to escalate this confrontation, I hopped in my car and left. But I had to turn around and get my child out of there. After picking up my child I went to my car where he again charged so I secured my toddler and shut the door. The shouting started again! Where was this coming from? Clearly something was brewing in this man and he sought to take out his rage on me even shouting that I get off his property 'before something happens.' And that is a very threatening remark, one that absolutely determined we would not be back despite having paid the month in advance. I just couldn't leave my child where there was a grown man in a rage running loose.
The staff was always fine, but anyone thinking about doing business here should think long and hard about leaving their child in a place where the owner's husband is on such a short fuse.